| AMICUS COMMITTEE |
|
The Amicus Brief Committee advises NAPABA's Board on the filing of amicus briefs by NAPABA, which works closely with other bar associations and public interest organizations on amicus briefs. For example, NAPABA joined with a broad coalition of Asian Pacific American (APA) groups in filing an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in the University of Michigan affirmative action litigation decided in 2003 (the Grutter and Gratz cases). NAPABA strives to ensure that the perspectives of APAs are presented to the judiciary, especially on issues likely to affect APAs as a group or in a distinctive manner. The Amicus Brief Committee welcomes the participation of individuals interested in its activities, as well as law firms interested in representing NAPABA on a pro bono basis. |
2/25/2026NAPABA Leads Broad Coalition to Defend Birthright Citizenship in the U.S. Supreme Court
2/19/2026NAPABA Welcomes the National Korean American Bar Association (NKABA) and the Chinese American Lawyer
1/23/2026NAPABA Supports the Language Access for All Act of 2026
1/21/2026NAPABA Applauds the Appointment of Justice Sanjay T. Tailor to the Illinois Supreme Court
1/16/2026MNAPABA and NAPABA Statement in Support of AANHPI and Immigrant Communities
5/19/2026 » 5/20/2026
NAPABA Lobby Day
5/19/2026
NAPABA Congressional Reception
11/12/2026 » 11/15/2026
2026 NAPABA Convention